silverthunder: (Luna - Looking to the future)
Aphrael ([personal profile] silverthunder) wrote2007-02-14 09:31 am
Entry tags:

Hmmm

One of my friends posted a link to this wank recently, and I'm not sure what exactly I'm thinking about it. Yes, the guy is a nutjob with the typical "if you don't like what I like, you're retarded" mentality. But he did make the post in his own journal rather than on a public forum the way most fandom clowns do. It's easy to justify spamming and posting mocking responses to someone when they make a post in some place public, because the assumption is that if you post in a public community, you are inviting discussion.

Can you justify spamming someone in their own journal when he or she has not posted their rant somewhere that would invite public discussion? I suppose it would be easy to say "well, he/she didn't make the post private, so why not?" But this person has not harmed you in any way with their craziness. They have not lashed out at you on a public forum or community. They are ranting, yes, but in their own space. You are the ones lashing out at this person, rather than the other way around. And doesn't that make you the bad person?

Any thoughts?

[identity profile] sailormac.livejournal.com 2007-02-14 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Apparently, it came out somewhere in the wank that he posted his threat to sue in the comments of someone else's LJ as well. When they take it to someone else's turf, it becomes a bit more of a grey area.

[identity profile] pichi.livejournal.com 2007-02-14 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Didn't read any of the rant or comments itself, just the summary on fandom_wank

My thoughts are that they're all immature. In making the public entry a frothing rant rather than a thoughtful commentary, yes, you ARE inviting wank, especially that kind of rant in that kind of fandom.

And if you bite the bait and go on a big attack there instead of simply making your own counter-rant in your own journal, you're not doing much better. To want to rant about things that irritate us is natural. The part so many people overlook is knowing who to rant to, and when you're transcending a purpose of venting annoyance and going into picking a fight. I would say both sides are responsible.

I think the correct course of action on the poster's part would have been to make the OMGYOUALLSUCKHARDCORE rant protected, and if he still wanted to make a public message about it, have a separate entry that was more eloquently worded. And the comment spammers need to realize that while they can justifiably become upset over some of the content in the rant, does it really matter what this one person thinks so much that you have to get vindictively proactive with him?