Yargh...

I realize most people on my friends list don't care any more, but umm, what?

The idea that any kind of voting system for allowing "questionable content" on LJ would work is just so ridiculous it cannot be expressed in words. Does this guy not know the definition of 'journal'? And what about minorities with interests that some would definie as questionable? They're not breaking any laws by talking about the things they like, but if a group of twats who didn't like it got together, they could technically be "voted out".

Besides that, who would decide which content was questionable enough to deserve a vote? There's a lot of grey area in this issue.